Terry Giesecke writes: I truly feel it’s about time we stopped blaming politicians and the media for the Speak defeat (“How Australia’s media took the straightforward road on the Speak”). The blame lies with the voters. Too many Australians are disengaged from the system. In Australia, constitutional alternate is the accountability of all voters, one among very few worldwide locations the put here is the case, but one which most voters eschew. Many notify there change into no longer sufficient information. Garbage. There change into hundreds.
Australia ranks about ninth in democracy and this lower rating is largely because of low ranges of engagement. As the teal circulation demonstrated, Australia’s political system is aesthetic initiate when you can cherish to savor a meander.
I frequently hear of us of my age notify our politicians are woeful, but each and every politician in Australia — native, recount and federal — is elected, so if they’re wretched who’s to blame? Maybe we ought to rethink compulsory vote casting so that individuals who don’t care won’t bother. Moreover, reforms similar to the Speak or the republic ought to initiate at recount level the put constitutional alternate is less advanced.
Glenn Turton writes: Misinformation change into permitted and reported with none are attempting at investigating truth by many news sources. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and his crew muddied the waters with lies, and most voters aren’t discerning sufficient or willing to save the work to sight the “info” they equipped.
I work with the neighborhood equipped as the supreme wretchedness: former, white males. Many blatantly acknowledged these dodgy claims — similar to the money spent, or the percentage of the Indigenous inhabitants who adverse the Speak — as though it change into truth. I’m 67 so I match the description but fortunately don’t savor the identical mentality. It seems we would favor to encourage for this age bracket to disappear away. That could well perchance well also mean I won’t sight anything meaningful in my lifetime. Sad.
News Get hold of Crikey FREE to your inbox each and every weekday morning with the Crikey Worm.
Truth in campaigning legislation is improperly wanted and would savor, presumably, made this most modern foray a fairer struggle. And presumably a fourth property with guts sufficient to demand questions rather than just regurgitate what’s given to them would savor helped?
Gary Paul writes: What an absolute pull-by Dutton, the LNP and their slim-minded followers are. Albanese can support his head excessive because of does what he says he will, unlike these others who notify anything, lie and deceive, and the media is that this mountainous land’s supreme wretchedness.
It change into Sure for me, but I deem it’s time First Countries peoples transfer on. One can not undo historical previous. They’ve just got to transfer and snatch it.
Miriam Germein writes: “The referendum’s consequence holds up a mirror to Australia, and the reflection is gruesome” is an fantastic article. I change into particularly taking into consideration about the exercise of “Australians all the time secure it perfect” — total bullshit in this context. It’s the favorite former: “We don’t dare disagree in wretchedness of losing your vote.”
As a former excessive college instructor looking at the dreary demise of humanities from 2000 onwards, I’d counsel that other than the unhealthy undermining of crucial taking into consideration skill constructing — sufficient to demand sources and read the subtext — the loss of Australian historical previous in the curriculum has been profound. And there’s completely no assured inclusion of Blackfulla perspectives cherish the Frontier Wars, so smartly elucidated by Rachel Perkins’ documentary.
I change into raised in nation South Australia and savor first-hand records of the patronising attitudes of locals to Indigenous occupants of the native mission and how their younger of us had been handled as tainted in the native college. I don’t mediate worthy has changed in the previous 60 years — except for for some exquisite examples in completely different parts of Australia countering the substandard life statistics of too many Indigenous communities.
Admire many of us who voted Sure, I am disgusted by the populist opportunism exercised for this historical event. Admire many, I’ve also been appalled at the media’s contribution to this constructing. Background historical previous for Jacinta Nampijinpa Label and Nyunggai Warren Mundine change into mandatory from the initiating to read their dishonesty, but the lack of interrogation by the ABC and others conferred a credibility totally undeserved. I’d also meander on but a Murdoch royal commission and other proposed legislation is now imperative. I reside in hope.
Margaret Hinchey writes: Christopher Warren’s “How Australia’s media took the straightforward road on the Speak” is fantastic. It takes a bold particular person to sight one’s savor occupation and net it wanting. I love the humility and clarity of belief in the article. Particularly, I agreed with this: “It jemmied the coverage into the all the time pointless steadiness of ‘each and every aspect’, as one among the gallery’s better thinkers, Laura Tingle, called out in the referendum marketing campaign’s demise days.”
I too stumbled on that the media coverage implied the completely different positions had been equal. How could well perchance well also they be when so worthy that change into save aside forward by the few No spokespeople change into swallowed total by worthy of the media with out declaring the lies, disinformation and nonsense the No case relied on? A working example change into Label’s repeated claim that she spoke for so many Indigenous communities who didn’t want the Speak. Now we uncover just about all the First Countries in a ways-off and rural areas returned just a few of the absolute most sensible Sure votes in the nation. “Steadiness” completely procedure bigger than an equal different of seconds and minutes.
I’m hoping Warren’s article would possibly be taken on board by journalists as their accountability to inform the public with truth and integrity.
Moreover, I mediate this article “‘What a stunt’: Albanese’s non-acknowledge the simplest clarifying moment in a nonsensical demand time” falls into the identical trap that many journalists savor over referendum reporting. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has acknowledged advert infinitum that he’s following what First Countries peoples requested of us. It change into no longer his thought. It change into the query and thought of Indigenous peoples in the Uluru Observation from the Coronary heart — seven years in the public enviornment!
First Countries peoples savor acknowledged they are taking per week of silence to encourage secure better from the “slap in the face” the majority of Australians gave them. Why would they no longer? Albanese, to his mountainous credit, is no longer going to “provide any clarity” because of he will wait to focus on about with the First Countries peoples when they truly feel in a recount to initiate up their scurry again. That’s respectful and acceptable — one thing many journalists could well perchance well also smartly emulate.
Michael Stanley writes: I truly don’t know whether we would even savor got previous the vitality of Dutton’s misinformation, Murdoch’s total media reach, or Label’s leading position as the “perfect” face of Indigenous Australia. I’ll leave that to others. To my thoughts, the Sure case made two — simplest two — catastrophic blunders. (And a third when you add in the usage of John Farnham’s “You’re the Speak”.)
- Blunder 1: the usage of the particular article “the”, which created a part, a bureaucratic “factor” that would also very smartly be portrayed as one thing monstrous and costly. The correct advance would were to make exercise of the indefinite article “a”. A Speak sounds cherish (and is) a plea. The save of the substandard sequence of grammatical article change into to take away the crucial plea ingredient and substitute it with some bureaucratic “factor” about which a wretchedness marketing campaign could well perchance well also very smartly be created;
- Blunder 2: the disgraceful paternalism by the Sure marketing campaign. We heard about the Uluru Observation from the Coronary heart but the commentary itself change into never save aside front and centre. There change into no media that I am mindful about that had a particular person read it to Australians or an commercial that filled the masks with that historical verbalize. “We” belief “we” could well perchance well also save a wiser job by “explaining” it. That’s paternalism perfect there in the coronary heart of Sure nation.
I truly savor a chum here in Darwin who believes (as save I) that the Uluru Observation will in time be understood as the most eloquent First Countries verbalize ever produced in the world, and we didn’t save aside it front and centre. As a ways as “You’re the Speak” goes, nothing celebratory must were chosen. Hour of darkness Oil has a song or two. Goanna has a song or two. Warumpi Band’s “Whitefella/Blackfella”, in all likelihood re-recorded by Thelma Plum, could well perchance well also were frail.
I guess what I am announcing is that the Sure marketing campaign denied Indigenous peoples their train Speak as expressed in the Uluru Observation from the Coronary heart.
Jeff Grissell writes: After I left college and started life as an adult my people and others told me: “Never signal a clean cheque, sales or aquire docket or in point of truth any clean form.” So after I heard the prime minister counsel I vote Sure for the Speak to be in the constitution and the particulars would possibly be sorted out later, he misplaced me.