Poltics
The grieving parents of a Salford woman have expressed their desire to forestall other families from “going through this hell” as they strengthen a legal campaign demanding more transparency about the characteristic of medical associates.
Marion and Brendan Chesterton are calling for “clear and robust” pointers outlining what physician associates (PA) and anaesthesia associates (AA) “can and cannot do”. They also want clarity on the extent of supervision supplied to those associates.
Their plea is available in the wake of their daughter Emily’s death, who tragically died from a pulmonary embolism in 2022 at legal 30 years ancient after being misdiagnosed by a PA.
READ MORE: Wales’ remarkable new cancer figures that reveal one factor the pandemic taught us
READ MORE: Cancer had already taken both my breasts sooner than I made a devastating discovery
Emily had visited her GP practice twice with complaints of calf pain and shortness of breath. She believed she had consulted with a GP, but it was actually a PA who incorrectly diagnosed her with long Covid and anxiety, prescribing medication to leisurely her heart rate.
Tragically, Emily passed away on October 31, 2022, experiences the Manchester Evening News. The Chestertons are backing a legal challenge by Anaesthetists United, which is anticipated to be lodged at the Excessive Court docket this week.
Anaesthetists United is urging the General Medical Council to “set limits on the tasks AAs and PAs may safely and lawfully undertake” and to “ensure AAs and PAs are properly supervised by doctors”.
Speaking on ITV’s Suitable Morning Britain on Monday, Mrs Chesterton said: “I’d like absolute clarity on what a PA or AA can, cannot do. Supervision is so vague at the moment. What is supervision? That needs sorting out. We don’t want any other family to go through this hell. We want it sorted for everyone: PAs themselves, patients, doctors. It’s got to be clear, robust. We need clarity, cohesion. We don’t need vagueness.”
Consultant anaesthetist Dr Richard Marks of Anaesthetists United remarked: “So, the legal action is aimed at defining much more clearly what these associates can and cannot do, because at the moment it’s just left up to the individual employers to decide.”
“We think there should be nationally agreed guidelines by experts that say what they can and can’t do and define the levels of supervision much more closely.”
When asked who is failing to take necessary action, Dr Marks spoke back: “We think it’s the General Medical Council. When regulation was first proposed everyone assumed it would do what it says on the tin, which is to define what that role is. It can’t be the NHS who defines it because there are associates who work outside the NHS.”
Mr Chesterton said: “Emily came out and she said ‘I’ve seen the doctor, the doctor said it’s just anxiety’. If she’d been sent (to A&E) on either occasion, the first time she saw the PA, second time she saw the PA, they could very probably have saved her life.”
“(Emily) thought she was a doctor,” he persevered. “We believed (she had seen) a doctor right until the week before the inquest five months later. And during the inquest the doctor stated ‘If I’d seen her I would have sent her to A and E’.”
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson expressed deep remorse over the incident: “This is a tragic case and our thoughts are with Emily Chesterton’s family and friends.”
Emily Chesterton
(Image: Lily Barnes)
They added that physician associates are meant to assist rather than replace medical doctors, stating: “We are clear that physician associates should be supporting, not replacing, doctors and receive the appropriate level of supervision by healthcare organisations.”
They additional emphasized adherence to pointers: “The NHS has issued clear guidance on the deployment of PAs in the NHS and we expect Trusts to follow this robustly.”
Meanwhile, a representative from the General Medical Council spoke back with sympathy and a dedication to standards: “We are very grateful to Mr and Mrs Chesterton for giving us the opportunity to meet with them earlier this year and listen to the important issues they raise, following the terribly sad and avoidable death of their daughter, Emily.”
The GMC clearly outlined the characteristic and limitations of non-doctor medical staff: “We are clear physician associates and anaesthesia associates are not doctors, cannot replace them, and should never be used to fill gaps in doctors’ rotas.” For the latest health and Covid information, be part of to our newsletter here
And they highlighted the upcoming regulatory measures: “When we begin regulating PAs and AAs later this year, we will expect them to always work under some degree of supervision and to practise within their competence. They will have a responsibility to clearly communicate who they are, and their role in the team.”
Lastly, the GMC stressed out the importance of staunch oversight from employers to make obvious safe practice: “Employers need to make sure there are appropriate governance structures in place, to make sure that PAs and AAs are working under appropriate supervision.”
“We will continue to work with patients, professionals, royal colleges, the BMA (British Medical Association) and others to deliver safe and effective regulation for physician associates and anaesthesia associates.”
